Run results for: Vanilla vs Cash vs Bliss vs jQuery JS Library Speed Test

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:137.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/137.0

Browser: Firefox 137

Operating system: Linux

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Cash Get ID

1.3M/s

jQuery Get ID

1.3M/s

Cash Get Text

1.3M/s

Vanilla Get ID

1.2M/s

Vanilla Get Html

1.1M/s

Vanilla Get Text

960K/s

jQuery Get Text

628K/s

Bliss Get ID

578K/s

Bliss Get Text

536K/s

Cash Get Html

510K/s

jQuery Get Html

462K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Cash Get ID	1,286,456 Ops/sec
jQuery Get ID	1,282,255 Ops/sec
Cash Get Text	1,271,036 Ops/sec
Vanilla Get ID	1,153,165 Ops/sec
Vanilla Get Html	1,082,576 Ops/sec
Vanilla Get Text	959,871 Ops/sec
jQuery Get Text	627,592 Ops/sec
Bliss Get ID	577,544 Ops/sec
Bliss Get Text	535,920 Ops/sec
Cash Get Html	510,426 Ops/sec
jQuery Get Html	462,309 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"><script>
<script>
  jQuery.noConflict();  
</script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/blissfuljs/1.0.4/bliss.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/cash/2.3.9/cash.min.js"></script>
<div id="foo">Hello World</div>

Tests:

Vanilla Get ID
var text = document.getElementById("foo");
Vanilla Get Text
var text = document.getElementById("foo").textContent;
Vanilla Get Html
var text = document.getElementById("foo").innerHTML;
Cash Get ID
var text = $("#foo");
Cash Get Text
var text = $("#foo").text();
Cash Get Html
var text = $("#foo").html();
Bliss Get ID
var text = Bliss("#foo");
Bliss Get Text
var text = Bliss("#foo").textContent;
jQuery Get ID
var text = jQuery("#foo");
jQuery Get Text
var text = jQuery("#foo").text();
jQuery Get Html
var text = jQuery("#foo").html();