Run results for: forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 18_4_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.4 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser: Mobile Safari 18

Operating system: iOS 18.4.1

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: one year ago

reduce

7K/s

forEach

7K/s

map

6K/s

for

6K/s

filter

6K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ reduce	6,914 Ops/sec
forEach	6,723 Ops/sec
map	6,386 Ops/sec
for	5,710 Ops/sec
filter	5,642 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 12345; i++) {
  arr[i] = i;
}

function someFn(i) {
  return (i * 3 * 8 / 1200 * 0.002 / 40 * 0.2);
}

var sumForEach = 0,
  sumReduce = 0,
  sumMap = 0,
  sumFilter = 0,
  sumFor = 0;

Tests:

forEach
arr.forEach(item => sumForEach += someFn(item));
reduce
sumReduce = arr.reduce((lastValue, item) => { return sumReduce += someFn(item); });
map
arr.map(item => (sumMap += someFn(item)));
filter
arr.filter(item => (sumFilter += someFn(item)));
for
for (var j = 0; j < arr.length; j++) { sumFor += arr[j]; }