Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=597853" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Android 15; Mobile; rv:137.0) Gecko/137.0 Firefox/137.0
Browser:
Firefox Mobile 137
Operating system:
Android
Device Platform:
Mobile
Date tested:
one year ago
String.includes
1414.0M/s
RegEx.test
22.6M/s
String.match
15.1M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
String.includes
1,413,983,488 Ops/sec
RegEx.test
22,635,740 Ops/sec
String.match
15,063,322 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var string = "Hello world!"; var regex = /Hello/;
Tests:
RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("Hello");
String.match
string.match("Hello");