Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match with multiple searches

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 134

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
RegEx.test	53047444.0 Ops/sec
String.includes	66260072.0 Ops/sec
String.match	16433164.0 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.";
var searches = ['ipsum', 'tempor', 'foobar', 'dolore', 'est']
var regex = new RegExp(searches.join("|"));

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
for (const search of searches) { if (string.includes(search)) break; }
String.match
string.match(regex);