Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
Map.has vs Set.has vs Array.includes 01.04.2025
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=596880" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 134
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Set.has
166.0M/s
Map.has
156.9M/s
Array.includes
66.1M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Set.has
166,040,688 Ops/sec
Map.has
156,876,144 Ops/sec
Array.includes
66,135,792 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
const set = new Set(["one", "two"]); const map = new Map([["one", true], ["two", true]]); const array = ['one', 'two'];
Tests:
Set.has
set.has('one'); set.has('two'); set.has('three');
Map.has
map.has('one'); map.has('two'); map.has('three');
Array.includes
array.includes('one'); array.includes('two'); array.includes('three');