Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
[] spread vs mutation vs Object.assign for reduce callback
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=596770" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 134
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
with mutation
17K/s
with object assign
408/s
with spread operator
130/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
with mutation
16,887 Ops/sec
with object assign
408 Ops/sec
with spread operator
130 Ops/sec
Tests:
with spread operator
const range = (from, to) => { const output = [] for(var x = from; x < to; x++){ output.push(x) } return output } range(0, 10000).reduce((acc, num) => { return { ...acc, [num]: num } }, {})
with mutation
const range = (from, to) => { const output = [] for(var x = from; x < to; x++){ output.push(x) } return output } range(0, 10000).reduce((acc, num) => { acc[num] = num return acc }, {})
with object assign
const range = (from, to) => { const output = [] for(var x = from; x < to; x++){ output.push(x) } return output } range(0, 10000).reduce((acc, num) => { return Object.assign(acc, {[num]: num}) }, {})