Run results for: luxon vs dayjs vs date-fns vs temporal-polyfill vs moment (formatting)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 134

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

dayjs v1.11.13

1.5M/s

moment.js v2.29.1

1.0M/s

luxon v3.5.0

730K/s

date-fns v4.1.0

38K/s

temporal-polyfill 0.2.5

38K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ dayjs v1.11.13	1,480,612 Ops/sec
moment.js v2.29.1	1,048,758 Ops/sec
luxon v3.5.0	730,121 Ops/sec
date-fns v4.1.0	38,156 Ops/sec
temporal-polyfill 0.2.5	37,659 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/luxon/3.5.0/luxon.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/dayjs/1.11.13/dayjs.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/4.1.0/cdn.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/temporal-polyfill@0.2.5/global.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.29.1/moment.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.timestamp = 1735660089
window.intlFormat = {
  year: "numeric",
  month: "2-digit",
  day: "2-digit",
  hour: "numeric",
  minute: "numeric",
  hour12: true,
}

Tests: