Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match 2

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 132

Operating system: Linux

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

RegEx.test

17.9M/s

String.includes

9.5M/s

String.match

1.3M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ RegEx.test	17,907,860 Ops/sec
String.includes	9,542,286 Ops/sec
String.match	1,334,913 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "/api/cms-content/v1/web/footer?foo=bas /api/cms-content/v1/mobile/footer?foo=bas";
var regex = /\/api\/cms-content\/v1\/web\/*|\/api\/cms-content\/v1\/mobile\/*/g;

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("/api/cms-content/v1/mobile") && string.includes("/api/cms-content/v1/web");
String.match
string.match("/api/cms-content/v1/mobile") && string.match("/api/cms-content/v1/web");