Run results for: Intl.DateTimeFormat

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 133

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

without Intl.DateTimeFormat

41.0M/s

with Intl.DateTimeFormat

621K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ without Intl.DateTimeFormat	40,959,852 Ops/sec
with Intl.DateTimeFormat	621,326 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var x = new Date('5/11/2018');
var y = new Date('5/11/2018');

var dateOptions = { weekday: 'long', year: 'numeric', month: 'long', day: 'numeric' };
var dateTimeFormat = new Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-US', dateOptions);

Tests:

without Intl.DateTimeFormat
var z = (x.getFullYear() === y.getFullYear() && x.getMonth() === y.getMonth() && x.getDate() === y.getDate());
with Intl.DateTimeFormat
var z = (dateTimeFormat.format(x) === dateTimeFormat.format(y));

Run results for: Intl.DateTimeFormat

Comparing 2 dates with Intl.DateTimeFormat vs using Date.get* methods

without Intl.DateTimeFormat

with Intl.DateTimeFormat