Run results for: Logs - RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 134

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

includes

184.2M/s

regex

20.4M/s

match

2.0M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ includes	184,235,808 Ops/sec
regex	20,448,860 Ops/sec
match	1,956,080 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

const regex = /TF_LOG|(?:Creating|Modifying|Destroying)\.\.\./;
const string = "module.helm_agent.helm_release.agent: Still modifying... [id=agent-bors, 10s elapsed]";

Tests:

match
function isRelevantLogEntryStrMatch(logEntry) { return ( logEntry.match('TF_LOG') || logEntry.match('Creating...') || logEntry.match('Modifying...') || logEntry.match('Destroying...') ); } isRelevantLogEntryStrMatch(string);
includes
function isRelevantLogEntryIncludes(logEntry) { return ( logEntry.includes('TF_LOG') || logEntry.includes('Creating...') || logEntry.includes('Modifying...') || logEntry.includes('Destroying...') ); } isRelevantLogEntryIncludes(string);
regex
function isRelevantLogEntryRegex(logEntry) { return regex.test(logEntry); } isRelevantLogEntryRegex(string);