Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
Compare digest performance
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:136.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/136.0
Browser:
Firefox 136
Operating system:
Ubuntu
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Test name
Executions per second
crypto.subtle.digest("SHA-512")
396623.7 Ops/sec
xxHash64
88908.2 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<script src=" https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/xxhashjs@0.2.2/build/xxhash.min.js "></script>
Script Preparation code:
var data = new Uint32Array(1024); window.crypto.getRandomValues(data); var dataBuffer = new Uint8Array(data); data = String.fromCharCode.apply(null, dataBuffer); // src: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/SubtleCrypto/digest function hex(buffer) { var hexCodes = []; var view = new DataView(buffer); for (var i = 0; i < view.byteLength; i += 4) { // Using getUint32 reduces the number of iterations needed (we process 4 bytes each time) var value = view.getUint32(i) // toString(16) will give the hex representation of the number without padding var stringValue = value.toString(16) // We use concatenation and slice for padding var padding = '00000000' var paddedValue = (padding + stringValue).slice(-padding.length) hexCodes.push(paddedValue); } // Join all the hex strings into one return hexCodes.join(""); }
Tests:
crypto.subtle.digest("SHA-512")
crypto.subtle.digest("SHA-512", dataBuffer ).then(function (hash) {console.log(hex(hash));});
xxHash64
console.log("xxHash:", XXH.h32().update(dataBuffer).digest().toString(16));