Run results for: JavaScript .sort() vs .toSorted ()vs [...].sort()

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 14695.114.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/102.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 102

Operating system: Chrome OS 14695.114.0

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Array.sort()

147K/s

[...Array].sort()

65K/s

Array.toSorted()

0/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Array.sort()	147,144 Ops/sec
[...Array].sort()	65,389 Ops/sec
Array.toSorted()	0 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

array = Array.from({
    length: 50
}, (x, i) => (Math.round(Math.random() * (i + .01) * 1000)))

sortNumeric = (a, b) => (Number(a) - Number(b));

Tests:

Array.sort()
array.sort(sortNumeric);
Array.toSorted()
array.toSorted(sortNumeric)
[...Array].sort()
[...array].sort(sortNumeric);

Run results for: JavaScript .sort() vs .toSorted ()vs [...].sort()

Compare Javascript sort performance

Array.sort()

Array.toSorted()

[...Array].sort()