Run results for: convert to set + set.has vs. array.includes

Check if it is faster to convert an array to a set and perform set.has(), compared to performing array.includes() on the base array.

Go to the benchmark
Run details:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 133
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Desktop
one year ago
Test name Executions per second
includes 88297216.0 Ops/sec
convert to set 7223729.0 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • includes

  • convert to set