Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
treeWalker param vs treefalker with filter function vs querySelectorAll edit
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 133
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Test name
Executions per second
treeWalker with param
265328.6 Ops/sec
treeWalker with filter function
9579.5 Ops/sec
querySelectorAll
842552.2 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<!-- article out start --> <article> <!-- article in start --> <h1>Lorem ipsum</h1> <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Cumque, nostrum.</p> <!-- article in end --> </article> <!-- article out end --> <!-- article out start --> <article> <!-- article in start --> <h1>Lorem ipsum</h1> <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Cumque, nostrum.</p> <!-- article in end --> </article> <!-- article out end --> <!-- article out start --> <article> <!-- article in start --> <h1>Lorem ipsum</h1> <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Cumque, nostrum.</p> <!-- article in end --> </article> <!-- article out end -->
Tests:
treeWalker with param
const treeWalker = document.createTreeWalker( document.body, NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT ); const list = []; while (treeWalker.nextNode()) { list.push(treeWalker.currentNode); }
treeWalker with filter function
const treeWalker = document.createTreeWalker( document.body, NodeFilter.SHOW_ALL, { acceptNode(node) { if (node.nodeType === Node.ELEMENT_NODE | Node.TEXT_NODE) { return NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT; } return NodeFilter.FILTER_REJECT; } } ); const list = []; while (treeWalker.nextNode()) { list.push(treeWalker.currentNode); }
querySelectorAll
const list = document.body.querySelectorAll('*');