Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match chitza
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=590690" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:135.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/135.0
Browser:
Firefox 135
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
String.includes
1506.1M/s
RegEx.test
45.5M/s
String.match
14.3M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
String.includes
1,506,075,520 Ops/sec
RegEx.test
45,499,224 Ops/sec
String.match
14,259,175 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var string = " - template: ./test/run-athena.yaml"; var regex = new RegExp('(?:- template:)(.*)$', 'gm');
Tests:
RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("- template:");
String.match
string.match("- template:");