Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
querySelectorAll.forEach() vs [...getElementsByClassName].forEach()
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:135.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/135.0
Browser:
Firefox 135
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
[...getElementsByClassName].forEach()
1.4M/s
querySelectorAll.forEach()
1.1M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
[...getElementsByClassName].forEach()
1,444,890 Ops/sec
querySelectorAll.forEach()
1,143,907 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="test"> <div class="saufdzgzg"> <div class="test"></div> </div> <div class="dsfdf"> <div class="test"> <div class="sd"></div> </div> </div> </div>
Tests:
querySelectorAll.forEach()
document.querySelectorAll(".test").forEach((element) => element.classList.add("nottest"));
[...getElementsByClassName].forEach()
[...document.getElementsByClassName("test")].forEach((element) => element.classList.add("nottest"));