Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
.includes() vs .test() vs .match() vs .indexOf()
Compare different intra-string matching styles
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) SamsungBrowser/27.0 Chrome/125.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome Mobile 125
Operating system:
Android
Device Platform:
Mobile
Date tested:
one year ago
text.includes()
67.5M/s
string.indexOf()
64.6M/s
regex.test()
14.4M/s
string.match()
10.6M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
text.includes()
67,485,408 Ops/sec
string.indexOf()
64,567,880 Ops/sec
regex.test()
14,434,333 Ops/sec
string.match()
10,624,407 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var url='https://www.google.com/matchthis/other/args'
Tests:
text.includes()
url.includes('matchthis')
regex.test()
/matchthis/.test(url)
string.match()
url.match(/matchthis/)
string.indexOf()
url.indexOf('matchthis') >= 0