Run results for: querySelectorAll.forEach() vs [...getElementsByClassName].forEach()

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 132

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

querySelectorAll.forEach()

858K/s

[...getElementsByClassName].forEach()

853K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ querySelectorAll.forEach()	858,032 Ops/sec
[...getElementsByClassName].forEach()	853,314 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<div class="test">
    <div class="saufdzgzg">
        <div class="test"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="dsfdf">
        <div class="test">
            <div class="sd"></div>
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

Tests:

querySelectorAll.forEach()
document.querySelectorAll(".test").forEach((element) => element.classList.add("nottest"));
[...getElementsByClassName].forEach()
[...document.getElementsByClassName("test")].forEach((element) => element.classList.add("nottest"));