Run results for: JavaScript string split vs match using regex v2

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 133

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

match * 6

21K/s

split * 6

14K/s

replace * 6

10K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ match * 6	21,157 Ops/sec
split * 6	14,420 Ops/sec
replace * 6	10,043 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script>
    var getRandomIntegerInclusive = (min, max) => {
        min = Math.ceil(min);
        max = Math.floor(max);
        return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min + 1)) + min;
    }
    var arr1 = "\u200b\xA0\x20\n".split("");

    var str1 = "This benchmark is testing if split or match is faster on a string using regex";
    var str2 = str1.replace(/\S/g, () => arr1[getRandomIntegerInclusive(0, 3)]);
    var regex = /[\u200b\xA0\x20\n]/g;
    var pxd = () => `${Math.floor(Math.random() * 314159265359 + 314159265359).toString(36)}`
</script>

Tests:

split * 6
`${str2}${pxd()}`.split(regex); `${str2}${pxd()}`.split(regex); `${str2}${pxd()}`.split(regex); `${str2}${pxd()}`.split(regex); `${str2}${pxd()}`.split(regex); `${str2}${pxd()}`.split(regex);
match * 6
`${str2}${pxd()}`.match(regex); `${str2}${pxd()}`.match(regex); `${str2}${pxd()}`.match(regex); `${str2}${pxd()}`.match(regex); `${str2}${pxd()}`.match(regex); `${str2}${pxd()}`.match(regex);
replace * 6
`${str2}${pxd()}`.replace(regex,''); `${str2}${pxd()}`.replace(regex,''); `${str2}${pxd()}`.replace(regex,''); `${str2}${pxd()}`.replace(regex,''); `${str2}${pxd()}`.replace(regex,''); `${str2}${pxd()}`.replace(regex,'');