Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.match(regex) for starting string
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=583904" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 132
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
String.includes
59.2M/s
RegEx.test
39.3M/s
String.match with regex
12.5M/s
String.match
5.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
String.includes
59,216,712 Ops/sec
RegEx.test
39,287,252 Ops/sec
String.match with regex
12,496,423 Ops/sec
String.match
5,760,694 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var string = "Hello world!"; var regex = /^Hello/g;
Tests:
RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.startsWith("Hello");
String.match
string.match("Hello");
String.match with regex
string.match(regex);