Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=583848" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:134.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/134.0
Browser:
Firefox 134
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
String.includes
1529.1M/s
RegEx.test
38.9M/s
String.match
22.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
String.includes
1,529,053,312 Ops/sec
RegEx.test
38,860,716 Ops/sec
String.match
22,809,196 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var string = "Hello world!"; var regex = /Hello/;
Tests:
RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("Hello");
String.match
string.match("Hello");