Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 18_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.1.1 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser: Mobile Safari 18

Operating system: iOS 18.1.1

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: one year ago

RegEx.test

376.4M/s

String.includes

48.1M/s

String.match

11.5M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ RegEx.test	376,359,392 Ops/sec
String.includes	48,090,376 Ops/sec
String.match	11,473,327 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "Hello world!";
var regex = /Hello/;

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("Hello");
String.match
string.match("Hello");