Run results for: luxon vs datefns

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 YaBrowser/24.12.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Yandex Browser 24

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

datefns

845K/s

luxon

511K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ datefns	845,474 Ops/sec
luxon	510,620 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.22.0/build/global/luxon.min.js" integrity="sha256-9nOzQsMIG12Bislqz+VUSDS8iyP0q4iCy1FfzoRvbXY=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://igor.moomers.org/random/datefns.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.ds = "2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00";

Tests:

datefns
window.datefns.parseISO(window.ds)
luxon
luxon.DateTime.fromISO(ds);