Run results for: filter vs _without (v2)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 131

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

check length

112.2M/s

_without clear

4K/s

_without

2K/s

filter clear

2K/s

filter

2K/s

View exact numbers

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var array = [...Array(100000).keys()];
var DEPRECATED = [98100];
var CLEAR_DEPRECATED = [];

Tests:

filter
array.filter(n => DEPRECATED.includes(n));
_without
_.without(array, ...DEPRECATED);
filter clear
array.filter(n => CLEAR_DEPRECATED.includes(n));
_without clear
_.without(array, ...CLEAR_DEPRECATED);
check length
if(CLEAR_DEPRECATED.length){ _.without(array, ...CLEAR_DEPRECATED); }