Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for (slightly optimized for (fixed))
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 131
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Test name
Executions per second
forEach
1230.3 Ops/sec
reduce
1251.9 Ops/sec
map
1264.1 Ops/sec
filter
1207.8 Ops/sec
for
1347.8 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var arr = []; for (var i = 0; i < 12345; i++) { arr[i] = i; } function someFn(i) { return (i * 3 * 8 / 1200 * 0.002 / 40 * 0.2); } var sumForEach = 0, sumReduce = 0, sumMap = 0, sumFilter = 0, sumFor = 0;
Tests:
forEach
arr.forEach(item => sumForEach += someFn(item));
reduce
sumReduce = arr.reduce((lastValue, item) => { return sumReduce += someFn(item); });
map
arr.map(item => (sumMap += someFn(item)));
filter
arr.filter(item => (sumFilter += someFn(item)));
for
for (let j = 0, len = arr.length; j < len; j++) { sumFor += someFn(arr[j]); }