Run results for: if vs callback vs currying condition comparison ver_2: static handle

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 131

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

test3_1: currying reverse

1.5M/s

test1: if

1.4M/s

test4: currying in try...catch

1.3M/s

test2: callback

1.2M/s

test3: currying

1.2M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ test3_1: currying reverse	1,519,401 Ops/sec
test1: if	1,364,705 Ops/sec
test4: currying in try...catch	1,266,329 Ops/sec
test2: callback	1,230,166 Ops/sec
test3: currying	1,204,689 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * max);
}

function handle(v) {
  console.log(`${v} >= 50`);
}

function test1(v) {
  v >= 50 && console.log(`${v} >= 50`);
}

function test2(v, fn) {
  v >= 50 && typeof fn === 'function' && fn(v);
}

function test3(v) {
  return (fn) => v >= 50 && typeof fn === 'function' && fn(v);
}

function test3_1(fn) {
  return typeof fn === 'function' ? (v) => v >= 50 && fn(v) : undefined;
}

function test4(v) {
  return (fn) => {
    try {
      v >= 50 && fn(v);
    } catch (e) {
    }
  };
}

Tests:

test1: if
test1(getRandomInt(100));
test2: callback
test2(getRandomInt(100), handle);
test3: currying
test3(getRandomInt(100))(handle);
test3_1: currying reverse
test3_1(handle)(getRandomInt(100));
test4: currying in try...catch
test4(getRandomInt(100))(handle);