Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
RegEx.test (with inline regex) vs. String.includes vs. String.match
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=578059" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 131
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
String.includes
163.7M/s
RegEx.test
45.1M/s
String.match
8.9M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
String.includes
163,684,736 Ops/sec
RegEx.test
45,086,504 Ops/sec
String.match
8,903,239 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var string = "Hello world!";
Tests:
RegEx.test
/Hello/.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("Hello");
String.match
string.match("Hello");