Run results for: filter: Native vs Underscore vs Lodash

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/131.0.0.0

Browser: Chrome 131

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

Underscore

991K/s

Lodash

917K/s

Native

838K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Underscore	991,316 Ops/sec
Lodash	916,521 Ops/sec
Native	838,005 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.8.3/underscore-min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var randomArray = Array.apply(null, Array(100)).map(function() {
	return Math.round(Math.random() * 1000);
});

function isBigEnough (value) {
  return value >= 10
}

// Underscore was loaded last, so this saves an instance of underscore and resets _ to it's previous value (lodash).
var _underscore = _.noConflict();
// This saves an instance of lodash and resets _ to it's previous value (undefined).
var _lodash = _.noConflict();

Tests:

Native
var filtered = randomArray.filter(isBigEnough);
Underscore
var filtered = _underscore.filter(randomArray, isBigEnough);
Lodash
var filtered = _lodash.filter(randomArray, isBigEnough);