Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
reduce.concat() vs flatMap()
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=572039" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 130
Operating system:
Linux
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Test name
Executions per second
reduce + Array.prototype.concat
694246.8 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.flatMap
1025419.8 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var flag = { a: {'truthy': true, 'falsey': false, 'only-in-a': true}, b: {'truthy': true, 'falsey': false, 'only-in-b': true}, unused: {'truthy': true, 'falsey': false}, }; var rollNames = ['a', 'b', 'missing'];
Tests:
reduce + Array.prototype.concat
var other = rollNames.flatMap(rollName => // convert flag object to array containing the names of all fields with a truthy value Object.entries(flag[rollName] ?? {}).reduce((opts, [key, value]) => opts.concat(value ? key : []), []) ).reduce((unique, option) => { // ensure option entries are unique return unique.includes(option) ? unique : unique.concat(option); }, []);
Array.prototype.flatMap
var other = [...new Set(rollNames.flatMap(rollName => // convert flag object to array containing the names of all fields with a truthy value Object.entries(flag[rollName] ?? {}).flatMap(([key, value]) => value ? [key] : []) ))];