Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
String.includes() vs. String.matchAll (no match)
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 131
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Test name
Executions per second
String.includes()
4285666.5 Ops/sec
String.matchAll()
2984228.8 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var string = 'vars.test asflkglsfsdfm;l; s;lfkg;sldf g;sd f; sd;fl ;lsd fg;lsd f;gdsfg s df;gl sdl;fgkl;sdkf gl;s df;gl s;dlfg;sdfg }}'; var startDelim = '{{'; var endDelim = '}}'; var matcher = new RegExp(`${startDelim}((?!${endDelim}).+?)${endDelim}`, 'g');
Tests:
String.includes()
string.includes(startDelim) && string.includes(endDelim);
String.matchAll()
string.matchAll(matcher);