Run results for: Array vs Uint32Array (TypedArray) (part 2)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 8.1.0; M1852 Build/OPM1.171019.026) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/96.0.4664.104 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome Mobile 96

Operating system: Android 8.1.0

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
Array.reverse()	21957.0 Ops/sec
TypedArray.reverse()	97001.3 Ops/sec
Array.toSorted()	0.0 Ops/sec
TypedArray.toSorted()	0.0 Ops/sec
Array.sort()	177.9 Ops/sec
TypedArray.sort()	9914.7 Ops/sec
Array[i] (sequential)	153.7 Ops/sec
TypedArray[i] (sequential)	162.5 Ops/sec
Array[i] (random)	51.5 Ops/sec
TypedArray[i] (random)	54.5 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var arr32 = new Uint32Array(16384)
crypto.getRandomValues(arr32)
var array = Array.from(arr32)

Tests:

Array.reverse()
array.reverse()
TypedArray.reverse()
arr32.reverse()
Array.toSorted()
array.toSorted()
TypedArray.toSorted()
arr32.toSorted()
Array.sort()
array.sort(); array.reverse(); // fast "un-sort"
TypedArray.sort()
arr32.sort(); arr32.reverse(); // fast "un-sort"
Array[i] (sequential)
for (let i = 0; i < 16384; i++) array[i]++
TypedArray[i] (sequential)
for (let i = 0; i < 16384; i++) arr32[i]++
Array[i] (random)
for(let i = 0; i < 16384; i++) array[i * 11003 % 16384] = array[i * 12011 % 16384] + array[i * 13001 % 16384]
TypedArray[i] (random)
for(let i = 0; i < 16384; i++) arr32[i * 11003 % 16384] = arr32[i * 12011 % 16384] + arr32[i * 13001 % 16384]

Run results for: Array vs Uint32Array (TypedArray) (part 2)

array.reverse(), array.toSorted(), array.sort(), array[i]

Array.reverse()

TypedArray.reverse()

Array.toSorted()

TypedArray.toSorted()

Array.sort()

TypedArray.sort()

Array[i] (sequential)

TypedArray[i] (sequential)

Array[i] (random)

TypedArray[i] (random)