Run results for: Array vs Uint32Array (TypedArray) (part 2)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 8.1.0; M1852 Build/OPM1.171019.026) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/96.0.4664.104 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome Mobile 96

Operating system: Android 8.1.0

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: one year ago

TypedArray.reverse()

97K/s

Array.reverse()

22K/s

TypedArray.sort()

10K/s

Array.sort()

178/s

TypedArray[i] (sequential)

162/s

Array[i] (sequential)

154/s

TypedArray[i] (random)

55/s

Array[i] (random)

52/s

Array.toSorted()

0/s

TypedArray.toSorted()

0/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ TypedArray.reverse()	97,001 Ops/sec
Array.reverse()	21,957 Ops/sec
TypedArray.sort()	9,915 Ops/sec
Array.sort()	178 Ops/sec
TypedArray[i] (sequential)	162 Ops/sec
Array[i] (sequential)	154 Ops/sec
TypedArray[i] (random)	55 Ops/sec
Array[i] (random)	52 Ops/sec
Array.toSorted()	0 Ops/sec
TypedArray.toSorted()	0 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var arr32 = new Uint32Array(16384)
crypto.getRandomValues(arr32)
var array = Array.from(arr32)

Tests:

Array.reverse()
array.reverse()
TypedArray.reverse()
arr32.reverse()
Array.toSorted()
array.toSorted()
TypedArray.toSorted()
arr32.toSorted()
Array.sort()
array.sort(); array.reverse(); // fast "un-sort"
TypedArray.sort()
arr32.sort(); arr32.reverse(); // fast "un-sort"
Array[i] (sequential)
for (let i = 0; i < 16384; i++) array[i]++
TypedArray[i] (sequential)
for (let i = 0; i < 16384; i++) arr32[i]++
Array[i] (random)
for(let i = 0; i < 16384; i++) array[i * 11003 % 16384] = array[i * 12011 % 16384] + array[i * 13001 % 16384]
TypedArray[i] (random)
for(let i = 0; i < 16384; i++) arr32[i * 11003 % 16384] = arr32[i * 12011 % 16384] + arr32[i * 13001 % 16384]