Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
RegExp constructor vs literal
Testing performance when using a new RegExp object vs a literal regex
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 130
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Literal
7.7M/s
new RegExp()
7.6M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Literal
7,652,300 Ops/sec
new RegExp()
7,620,417 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var reConstructor = new RegExp('^[0-9a-fA-F]{24}$') var reLiteral = /^[0-9a-fA-F]{24}$/
Tests:
new RegExp()
reConstructor.test('132abc67219f019afe12901a')
Literal
reLiteral.test('132abc67219f019afe12901a')