Run results for: What's faster? cached Intl.NumberFormat vs new Intl.NumberFormat vs toLocaleString currency

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 130

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

cached Intl.NumberFormat instance

1.1M/s

Number.prototype.toLocaleString

30K/s

new Intl.NumberFormat

28K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ cached Intl.NumberFormat instance	1,148,844 Ops/sec
Number.prototype.toLocaleString	29,503 Ops/sec
new Intl.NumberFormat	28,193 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

window.cachedFormatter = new Intl.NumberFormat('pt-BR', { style: 'currency', currency: 'BRL' });

Tests:

cached Intl.NumberFormat instance
window.cachedFormatter.format(3_950_219.56);
new Intl.NumberFormat
new Intl.NumberFormat('pt-BR', { style: 'currency', currency: 'BRL' }).format(3_950_219.56);
Number.prototype.toLocaleString
(3_950_219.56).toLocaleString('pt-BR', { style: 'currency', currency: 'BRL' });