Run results for: dayjs vs luxon withTimezoneFromString

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 130

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

dayjs

31K/s

luxon

16K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ dayjs	31,076 Ops/sec
luxon	15,527 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dayjs@1.11.11/dayjs.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dayjs@1.11.11/plugin/timezone.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dayjs@1.11.11/plugin/utc.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.28.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

dayjs.extend(window.dayjs_plugin_utc)
dayjs.extend(window.dayjs_plugin_timezone)

window.__date__ = '2024-05-27 08:33';
window.__format__ = 'YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm';
window.__timezone__ = 'Europe/Warsaw';
window.__luxon__ = luxon;
window.__dayjs__ = dayjs;

Tests:

luxon
__luxon__.DateTime.fromFormat(__date__, 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm', { zone: __timezone__ });
dayjs
__dayjs__.tz(__date__, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm', __timezone__);