Run results for: dayjs vs luxon vs js-joda vs date-fns (parsing)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 130

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

date-fns

1.2M/s

Dayjs

246K/s

js-joda

180K/s

luxon

35K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ date-fns	1,201,987 Ops/sec
Dayjs	245,993 Ops/sec
js-joda	180,371 Ops/sec
luxon	34,521 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dayjs@1.11.9/dayjs.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dayjs@1/plugin/customParseFormat.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@3.4.3/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@js-joda/core@5.5.3/dist/js-joda.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/1.9.0/date_fns.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

dayjs.extend(window.dayjs_plugin_customParseFormat);

Tests:

Dayjs
dayjs('23/9/1 0:0:0', 'YY/M/D H:m:s');
luxon
luxon.DateTime.fromFormat('23/9/1 0:0:0', 'yy/M/d H:m:s');
js-joda
JSJoda.LocalDateTime.parse('23/9/1 0:0:0', JSJoda.DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern('yy/M/d H:m:s'));
date-fns
dateFns.parse('23/9/1 0:0:0', 'yy/M/d H:m:s', new Date())