Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 16_7_10 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/16.6 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser: Mobile Safari 16

Operating system: iOS 16.7.10

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: one year ago

String.includes

7.3M/s

String.match

4.7M/s

RegEx.test

4.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ String.includes	7,256,092 Ops/sec
String.match	4,697,071 Ops/sec
RegEx.test	4,365,192 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "Hello world!";
var regex = /Hello/;

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("Hello");
String.match
string.match("Hello");