Run results for: cached Intl.NumberFormat vs new Intl.NumberFormat vs toLocaleString currency

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 130

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

toLocaleString

28.1M/s

cached Intl.NumberFormat

1.6M/s

new Intl.NumberFormat

51K/s

View exact numbers

Tests:

cached Intl.NumberFormat
window.a = window.a || new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', { style: 'currency', currency: 'EUR' }); window.a.format("10000")
new Intl.NumberFormat
new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', { style: 'currency', currency: 'EUR' }).format('10000');
toLocaleString
"10000".toLocaleString('en-US', { style: 'currency', currency: 'EUR' })