Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
forEach vs filter().map() vs map().filter()
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/129.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 129
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Test name
Executions per second
forEach
116854.3 Ops/sec
filter.map
123583.6 Ops/sec
map.filter
45660.5 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var arr = []; for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { arr[i] = { i, extra: Math.random() < 0.5 ? null : 'test' }; }
Tests:
forEach
var newArr = []; arr.forEach((x) => { if (x.extra !== null) { newArr.push({ ...x, extra: x.extra + '!' }); } });
filter.map
var newArr = arr .filter((x) => x.extra !== null) .map((x) => ({ ...x, extra: x.extra + '!' }));
map.filter
var newArr = arr .map((x) => ({ ...x, extra: x.extra + '!' })) .filter((x) => x.extra !== null)