Run results for: Ramda vs. Lodash vs vanilla js

Compares performance on the same task using Lodash vs two styles of Ramda vs two styles of "native" Javascript. In all cases the task is pulling "counter" property from each item in an array, filtering out odd items, squaring them, then returning those squared values that have less than two digits.

Go to the benchmark

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Android 15; Mobile; rv:131.0) Gecko/131.0 Firefox/131.0

Browser: Firefox Mobile 131

Operating system: Android

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

Lodash

2.5M/s

Vanilla Js

18K/s

Ramda without relying on currying or composition

12K/s

Ramda with currying and composition

7K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Lodash	2,545,444 Ops/sec
Vanilla Js	18,163 Ops/sec
Ramda without relying on currying or composition	12,482 Ops/sec
Ramda with currying and composition	7,430 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.1/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.20/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data = _.range(10000);

function isOdd(num) {
  return num % 2 === 1;
}

function square(num) {
  return num * num;
}

function lessThanThreeDigits(num) {
  return num.toString().length < 3;
}

Tests:

Vanilla Js
var result = data.map(square)
Ramda without relying on currying or composition
var result = R.map(square)(data)
Ramda with currying and composition
var result = R.pipe( R.map(square) )(data);
Lodash
var result = _.chain(data) .map(square)