Run results for: compression libraries comparison

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/129.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 129

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

unzip fflate b

741K/s

unzip pako b

34K/s

zip fflate b

14K/s

zip pako b

9K/s

unzip fflate a

607/s

unzip pako a

113/s

zip pako a

80/s

zip fflate a

66/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ unzip fflate b	740,855 Ops/sec
unzip pako b	34,344 Ops/sec
zip fflate b	14,256 Ops/sec
zip pako b	8,851 Ops/sec
unzip fflate a	607 Ops/sec
unzip pako a	113 Ops/sec
zip pako a	80 Ops/sec
zip fflate a	66 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://unpkg.com/fflate"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pako/2.0.3/pako.es5.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var enc = new TextEncoder();
var a = new Uint8Array([...Array(1000000).keys()]);
var b = enc.encode('The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog')
var ca = pako.gzip(a)
var cb = pako.gzip(b)

Tests:

unzip pako a
pako.inflate(ca)
unzip pako b
pako.inflate(cb)
zip pako a
pako.deflate(a)
zip pako b
pako.deflate(b)
unzip fflate a
fflate.decompressSync(ca);
unzip fflate b
fflate.decompressSync(cb);
zip fflate a
fflate.gzipSync(a)
zip fflate b
fflate.gzipSync(b)