Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
Array for vs Array for of vs Set for of vs Set forEach * 100
Testing the difference between native loops and find()
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=559465" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1
Browser:
Mobile Safari 14
Operating system:
iOS 14.1
Device Platform:
Mobile
Date tested:
one year ago
Test name
Executions per second
Array for-loop
14259.1 Ops/sec
Array for..of
42729.1 Ops/sec
Set for of
40839.3 Ops/sec
Set forEach
41573.5 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<div id='test'></div>
Script Preparation code:
window.fn = function fn() {} window.arr = new Array(100).fill(0).map((x, i) => i.toString()); window.set = new Set(arr);
Tests:
Array for-loop
for(i=0, l = arr.length; i<l; i++){ fn(arr[i]); }
Array for..of
for (let value of arr) { fn(value); }
Set for of
for (let value of set) { fn(value); }
Set forEach
set.forEach(value => fn(value));