Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
Array.includes() vs Set.has() for small array
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=559007" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome Mobile 124
Operating system:
Android
Device Platform:
Mobile
Date tested:
one year ago
Test name
Executions per second
Find the second element in array
7191981.0 Ops/sec
Find the second element in set
7303041.0 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
arr = ["test1", "test2"] set = new Set(["test1", "test2"]);
Tests:
Find the second element in array
arr.includes("test2");
Find the second element in set
set.has("test2");