Run results for: Traverse function vs NodeIterator vs TreeWalker

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:130.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/130.0

Browser: Firefox 130

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

NodeIterator with filter param

1.6M/s

TreeWalker with filter param

1.3M/s

Traverse function

511K/s

TreeWalker with filter function

274K/s

NodeIterator with filter function

115K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ NodeIterator with filter param	1,626,571 Ops/sec
TreeWalker with filter param	1,326,045 Ops/sec
Traverse function	510,616 Ops/sec
TreeWalker with filter function	273,503 Ops/sec
NodeIterator with filter function	114,885 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

// language=HTML
const html = `
    <!-- article out start -->
    <article>
        <!-- article in start -->
        <h1>Lorem ipsum</h1>
        <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Cumque, nostrum.</p>
        <!-- article in end -->
    </article>
    <!-- article out end -->

    <!-- article out start -->
    <article>
        <!-- article in start -->
        <h1>Lorem ipsum</h1>
        <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Cumque, nostrum.</p>
        <!-- article in end -->
    </article>
    <!-- article out end -->

    <!-- article out start -->
    <article>
        <!-- article in start -->
        <h1>Lorem ipsum</h1>
        <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Cumque, nostrum.</p>
        <!-- article in end -->
    </article>
    <!-- article out end -->
`;
const template = document.createElement('template');
template.innerHTML = html;

window.testTemplate = template;

window.testTraverse = function traverse(node, use) {
    if (!node) return;

    use(node);
    traverse(node.firstChild, use);
    traverse(node.nextSibling, use);
}

Tests: