Run results for: native reverse find vs findLast

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 128

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

array find

6.9M/s

_.findLast

6.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ array find	6,894,690 Ops/sec
_.findLast	6,375,179 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.core.js"></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var users = [
  { 'user': 'joey',  'age': 32 },
  { 'user': 'ross',    'age': 41 },
  { 'user': 'chandler', 'age': 39 }
]

Tests:

array find
// Native users.slice().reverse().find(function (o) { return o.age < 40; })
_.findLast
users.findLast(function (o) { return o.age < 40; })

Run results for: native reverse find vs findLast

Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method

array find

_.findLast