Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
set.get vs native include vs lodash include in small data scale
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=553727" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 126
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Test name
Executions per second
lodash includes
4795727.0 Ops/sec
native includes
9846598.0 Ops/sec
set. has
495847.5 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr = [] for(var i = 0; i < 99; i++) { arr.push(Math.random()) }
Tests:
lodash includes
_.includes(arr, Math.random())
native includes
arr.includes(Math.random())
set. has
var demoSet = new Set(arr);demoSet.has(Math.random())