Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator vs flat
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=553602" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 128
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
Benchmark engine:
Benchmark.js
spread operator
58.6M/s
Array.prototype.concat
16.0M/s
Array.prototype.flat
7.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
spread operator
58,587,276 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.concat
15,968,145 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.flat
7,763,623 Ops/sec
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Array.prototype.flat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [1, 2, params].flat()