Run results for: Regex vs String.includes in Array.filter v2

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 128

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

String includes with toLowerCase

5.4M/s

Regex match

5.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ String includes with toLowerCase	5,393,952 Ops/sec
Regex match	5,353,582 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var array = ["PHV Versicherung", "Rücktrittsversicherung", "Lebensversicherung"]
var searchStrings = ["rücktritt", "versicher", "rung", "P"]

Tests:

Regex match
for(let i = 0; i < searchStrings; i++) { array.filter(str => { const rgx = new RegExp(searchStrings[i], "i"); return str.match(rgx); }) }
String includes with toLowerCase
for(let i = 0; i < searchStrings; i++) { array.filter(str => { return str.toLowerCase().includes(searchStrings[i].toLowerCase()); }) }