Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.indexOf - Long String

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/128.0.0.0

Browser: Chrome 128

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

String.includes

28.8M/s

String.indexOf

24.2M/s

RegEx.test

8.7M/s

String.match

6.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ String.includes	28,768,680 Ops/sec
String.indexOf	24,242,802 Ops/sec
RegEx.test	8,693,168 Ops/sec
String.match	6,363,812 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Ipsam aliquid architecto earum eveniet, commodi nesciunt officia enim, veritatis fugiat ea cumque ipsum, obcaecati deleniti necessitatibus magnam cupiditate consequatur numquam neque ducimus fugit aut nemo eligendi. Odit, cumque! Nisi nemo, tempore magni ad consequatur facere praesentium velit autem assumenda ipsum commodi aliquid nulla labore iste rerum blanditiis est sed enim aut obcaecati vitae. Sunt esse voluptates eaque facere tempora! Nemo corporis harum reprehenderit, placeat error incidunt, esse blanditiis doloremque accusantium adipisci alias fugiat. Aut et dolor ad, nihil obcaecati modi recusandae sed ipsa esse, placeat tempora hic, facilis nobis. Inventore, nemo.";
var regex = /architecto/;

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("architecto");
String.match
string.match("architecto");
String.indexOf
string.indexOf("architecto");