Run results for: lodash compact vs es6 compact/filter

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 128

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

es6 filter fn

3.8M/s

compact helper fn

2.8M/s

lodash compact

2.3M/s

es6 filter fn boolean

1.5M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ es6 filter fn	3,798,593 Ops/sec
compact helper fn	2,823,526 Ops/sec
lodash compact	2,276,082 Ops/sec
es6 filter fn boolean	1,479,824 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data = [null, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, null, null, null, 3, 4,5, 6, 34,341,2,2,2,1,212,21212,34,1,3112, null];
var compact = (arr) => arr.filter((o) => !!o);

Tests:

lodash compact
_.compact(data);
compact helper fn
compact(data);
es6 filter fn
data.filter((o) => !!o);
es6 filter fn boolean
data.filter(Boolean)