Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
RegExp constructor vs literal
Testing performance when using a new RegExp object vs a literal regex
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 127
Operating system:
Linux
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
new RegExp()
4.9M/s
Literal
4.7M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
new RegExp()
4,874,376 Ops/sec
Literal
4,705,690 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var reConstructor = new RegExp('^[0-9a-fA-F]{24}$') var reLiteral = /^[0-9a-fA-F]{24}$/
Tests:
new RegExp()
reConstructor.test('132abc67219f019afe12901a')
Literal
reLiteral.test('132abc67219f019afe12901a')